Claim · model-written summary
angle of first order branch differed by direction.
- Taxon
- Moringa oleifera
Moringa oleiferat0 - Outcome
- angle of first order branche0
- Setting
- different directionse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In different directions, the branching pattern had significant differences in the length of main and lateral branches and the angle of first order branch.”
t0“Moringa oleifera”
Title
Effects of planting density on the branching pattern and biomass of Moringa oleifera plantation
Yanping Zhang Shengtaixue zazhi 2012
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Association plant height was negatively correlated with planting density.
- Association basal diameter was negatively correlated with planting density.
- Association crown breadth was negatively correlated with planting density.
- Association branch number was negatively correlated with planting density.
- Intervention effect biomass of root differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect stem differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect foliage differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect pod number differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect length differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect diameter differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect grains per pod differed among planting densities.
- Intervention effect ratios of first order branch to second order branch differed with planting density.
- Intervention effect second order branch to third order branch differed with planting density.
- Intervention effect third order branch length differed with planting density.
- Association length of main differed by direction.
- Association lateral branches differed by direction.
- Recommendation The suggested spacing for foliage production is 0.9 m ×0.9 m.
- Recommendation The suggested spacing for pod production is 1.5 m × 1.5 m.
- Observation Differences in branch pattern and biomass suggest morphological plasticity and ecological adaptability.