Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Both 1% and 2% farmyard manure reduced disease incidence to 33%.

A claim from Management of Collar Rot Disease in Chili by Farmyard Manure and Commercial Biofertilizers · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both 1% and 2% farmyard manure reduced disease incidence to 33%.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
1% and 2% FYM amendmente0
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
positive controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1% and 2% FYM amendment reduced disease incidence to 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–894
e1

“Inoculation of soil with S. rolfsii only (positive control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–636
t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41

Title

Management of Collar Rot Disease in Chili by Farmyard Manure and Commercial Biofertilizers

Nighat Sana; Amna Shoaib; Arshad Javaid Sains Malaysiana 2017. doi:10.17576/jsm-2017-4610-04

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-36f1e2f8cc28bbf1189462a5f55fba0ebdc310edaec18bb02358a04e1f3c2df9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

other · Agroathelia rolfsii · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · Agroathelia rolfsii · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.