Claim · model-written summary
Authors suggest strong antifeedant activity at seed filling.
- Organ / stage
- seed-filling stagee0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Outcome
- strong antifeedant activity against the aphide0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“at the seed-filling stage the mechanism was a strong antifeedant activity against the aphid”
Title
Control mechanism of wheat seed dressing with imidacloprid against Macrosiphum avenae Fabricius
Zhanlin Gao Hebei Nongye Daxue xuebao 2013
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation At the seedling stage, dressed wheat had strong stomach poison activity against aphids.
- Observation At booting, aphid survival on dressed wheat was 42.56%.
- Observation At seed filling, aphid survival within 24 hours was 77.33%.
- Intervention effect At booting, honeydew excretion was 7.86% of CK.
- Intervention effect At seed filling, honeydew excretion was 8.59% of CK.
- Association Aphid survival was higher at seed filling than at booting.
- Association Honeydew excretion differed significantly between booting and seed filling.
- Intervention effect At seed filling, aphid sucking number was 39.19% of control.
- Mechanism Imidacloprid seed dressing had antifeedant activity against aphids.
- Mechanism Authors suggest stomach poison activity dominates at the seedling stage.
- Mechanism Authors suggest stomach poison and antifeedant activity act together at booting.