Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed coating may be more cost effective than the other formulations.

A claim from Integrating Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. strigae into cereal cropping systems in Africa · 2009

Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating may be more cost effective than the other formulations.

Taxon
sorghum and maizeSorghumZea mayse1
Treatment
seed coatinge2
Outcome
cost effectivee2
Direction
moree2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of S. hermonthica control using different formulations of three isolates of Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. emend. Synder & Hans f. sp. strigae was tested on Striga-resistant and Striga-susceptible varieties of sorghum and maize under African field conditions for the first time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–743
e2

“seed coating may be more cost effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1670

Title

Integrating Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. strigae into cereal cropping systems in Africa

Julien Venne; Fen Beed; Adolphe Avocanh; et al. Pest Management Science 2009. doi:10.1002/ps.1741

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-38fbbfdef89015d04930bda0f7a0b852bc33d10b7aa4b564abcad8bf8ba73d3d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.