Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azadirachta indica powder yielded fewer bruchid eggs than control.

A claim from COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF INSECTICIDAL PLANTS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF GROUNDNUT BRUCHID (CARYEDON SERRATUS) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica powder yielded fewer bruchid eggs than control.

Taxon
GROUNDNUTArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
A. indicae0
Interactor
C. serratusCaryedon serratuse2pest
Outcome
number of eggse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Caryedon serratus
Caryedon serratus · Interactordivision, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest mean number of eggs was laid in A. indica, L. camara and T. vogelli treated seeds compared with the control which recorded the highest number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1313
e1

“Azadirachta indica A. Juss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–120
e2

“damage by C. serratus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1442
t0

“GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74

Title

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF INSECTICIDAL PLANTS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF GROUNDNUT BRUCHID (CARYEDON SERRATUS)

Simon Idoko Okweche Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences 2015. doi:10.18551/rjoas.2015-03.03

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-3ab983ff2bdce38cd33b8c8c62ed289eaacf6b15fcfd075601ab9c5dd883c535 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Azadirachta indica · Caryedon serratus · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.