Claim · model-written summary
Coefficient of variation of CO2 diffusivity in pear tissue was 2.1–2.4% for chamber volumes of 7.5–15 mL and tissue thickness of 1–2.5 mm.
- Taxon
- pear
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communist0 - Outcome
- coefficient of variation of diffusivity of O 2 and CO 2e3
- Value
- 2.1–2.4%e3
- Qualifier
- for a measurement chamber volume between 7.5 and 15 mL and a tissue thickness of 1–2.5 mme3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Simultaneous measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide diffusivities in pear fruit tissue using optical sensors”
e3“The coefficient of variation of diffusivity of O 2 and CO 2 in pear tissue due to bias, variation of the sample thickness and volume of the measurement chamber was 2.0–2.3% and 2.1–2.4% for a measurement chamber volume between 7.5 and 15 mL and a tissue thickness of 1–2.5 mm, respectively”
Title
Quang Tri Ho; Bert E Verlinden; Pieter Verboven; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2902
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation Optical sensors produced informative O2 and CO2 partial pressure versus time profiles in pear tissue.
- Observation Average O2 diffusivity of pear cortex tissue was (2.56 ± 0.48) × 10 −10 m 2 s −1.
- Observation Average CO2 diffusivity of pear cortex tissue was (3.8 ± 1.1) × 10 −9 m 2 s −1.
- Method / resource Coefficient of variation of O2 diffusivity in pear tissue was 2.0–2.3% for chamber volumes of 7.5–15 mL and tissue thickness of 1–2.5 mm.
- Method / resource Variability of estimated diffusivities due to measurement errors was eight times smaller than biological variability.