Observationmodel-written summary

The identified phytoplasma was not considered a quarantine pest, so no phytosanitary measures were taken.

A claim from First Detection of a Phytoplasma From the 16SrV‐C (Elm yellows) Group in Alnus glutinosa in the Netherlands · 2025

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The identified phytoplasma was not considered a quarantine pest, so no phytosanitary measures were taken.

Taxon
Alnus glutinosaAlnus glutinosae1
Interactor
phytoplasmaCandidatus Phytoplasmae0pathogen
Outcome
no phytosanitary measures were takene0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Candidatus Phytoplasma
Candidatus Phytoplasma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Estreya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The identified phytoplasma was not considered a quarantine pest, and therefore, no phytosanitary measures were taken”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3131–3247
e1

“black alder (Alnus glutinosa) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–95

Title

First Detection of a Phytoplasma From the 16SrV‐C (Elm yellows) Group in Alnus glutinosa in the Netherlands

P. P. M. de Koning; R. Schoen; Z. Kogej Zwitter; et al. New Disease Reports 2025. doi:10.1002/ndr2.70056

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-3d05cce40fa60f7a72777b7716be5d08937dc7b728c7bff5293dd9d8a56f1fdf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer