Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dry fodder yield increased significantly with nitrogen up to 120 kg/ha, 7.1% above 80 kg/ha.

A claim from Effect of Tillage and Nitrogen Rates on Fodder Productivity and Juice Quality of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.) in Himalayan Foothills of India · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry fodder yield increased significantly with nitrogen up to 120 kg/ha, 7.1% above 80 kg/ha.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
120 Kg N/hae3
Outcome
fodder yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Value
7.1e3
Qualifier
drye3
Comparator
80 kg N/hae3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–115
e3

“The green and dry fodder yields increased significantly with increasing levels and highest values were obtained at 120 Kg N/ha that had 6.9 and 7.1% higher than 80 kg N/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1365

Title

Effect of Tillage and Nitrogen Rates on Fodder Productivity and Juice Quality of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.) in Himalayan Foothills of India

Manoj Kumar; Mahendra Singh Pal Acta Scientific Agriculture 2024. doi:10.31080/asag.2024.08.1352

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-3defd6f6e7141c8df98e67911e1ee5ae0e37db87c82aea799fe0af7fa297d65b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

281 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.