Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A combination spray of 0.125 Ib AI/acre each of methomyl and chlordimeform was highly effective for controlling both insect species in spring and fall.

A claim from Corn Earworm and Fall Armyworm: Comparative Larval Populations and Insecticidal Control on Sweet Corn in Florida12 · 1975

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A combination spray of 0.125 Ib AI/acre each of methomyl and chlordimeform was highly effective for controlling both insect species in spring and fall.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
combination spray containing only 0.125 Ib AI/acre of each methomyl and chlordimeforme1
Interactor
Heliothis zeaHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Second interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
controlling both insect speciese1
Direction
highly effectivee1
Value
0.125 Ib AI/acree1
Setting
spring and falle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · Second interactorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Sweet Corn in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–112
e0

“for effectiveness in controlling the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie), and the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–233
e1

“A combination spray containing only 0.125 Ib AI/acre of each methomyl and chlordimeform appears very promising for controlling both insect species as it was highly effective in the spring and fall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109

Title

Corn Earworm and Fall Armyworm: Comparative Larval Populations and Insecticidal Control on Sweet Corn in Florida12

M. J. Janes Journal of Economic Entomology 1975. doi:10.1093/jee/68.5.657

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3f604eea9e9afc4a98013ce9e64e4dc0675ac6b88f79c6f6618c7fd7418567ee · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

methomyl · Helicoverpa zea · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

application · Helicoverpa zea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.