Claim · model-written summary
Weedy check had the lowest benefit to cost ratio of 1.07.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“lowest monetary returns and B: C ratio (Rs. 46160/ha and 1.07) was recorded in weedy check”
t0“mungbean”
Title
Fayaz Ahmed Bahar; S.A. Dar; Ajaz A. Lone; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.103
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Flat and ridge bed methods gave comparable grain yield.
- Intervention effect Yield attributing characters did not differ significantly between bed configurations.
- Intervention effect Bed configuration did not significantly change weed density at 30 and 60 DAS.
- Intervention effect Bed configuration did not significantly change weed dry matter at 30 and 60 DAS.
- Intervention effect Weedy check produced the lowest grain yield, 552 kg/ha, significantly below the other treatments.
- Intervention effect Sequential pendimethalin and imazethapyr produced the highest grain yield, 818.75 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect Sequential pendimethalin and imazethapyr increased grain yield 48.04 % over weedy check.
- Intervention effect Imazethapyr increased grain yield 33.92% over weedy check.
- Intervention effect Pendimethalin increased grain yield 18.62% over weedy check.
- Observation The sequential herbicide treatment gave the highest monetary returns of Rs. 68500/ha.
- Observation The sequential herbicide treatment gave the highest benefit to cost ratio of 1.96.
- Observation Weedy check had the lowest monetary returns of Rs. 46160/ha.
- Intervention effect Uncontrolled weeds reduced mungbean grain yield by 32.58 per cent.