Claim · model-written summary
Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Treatment
- weeding and hoeing (T6)e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- decreasee1
- Value
- 30.1e1
- Qualifier
- Non-adoption of individual factorse1
- Comparator
- T1 (FPP)e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
e1“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
Title
Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
- Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
- Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
- Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.