Claim · model-written summary
Most herbicide treatments appeared to injure proso millet plants to varying degrees.
- Taxon
- proso millet
Panicum miliaceume0 - Treatment
- All herbicides except the amine of 2,4-D at 0.28 kg/hae2
- Outcome
- injure proso millet plantse2
- Qualifier
- by varying degreese2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Eight herbicide postemergence treatments were applied to proso millet ( Panicum milaceum L.) at three growth stages”
e2“All herbicides except the amine of 2,4-D at 0.28 kg/ha appeared to injure proso millet plants by varying degrees; however, yields were not greatly affected”
Title
Selective Control of Weeds in Proso Millet with Herbicides
P. H. Grabouski Weed Science 1971. doi:10.1017/s0043174500048724
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect The dimethylamine salt of 2,4-D at 0.56 kg/ha gave significantly higher proso millet grain yields than the weedy check.
- Intervention effect Herbicide treatments did not greatly affect proso millet yields.
- Intervention effect All herbicides gave excellent control of redroot pigweed when applied to proso millet at the 4 to 6-leaf stage.
- Intervention effect Weed control was poorer when spraying was delayed until proso millet was in pre-boot and post-flower stages.