Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 100% maize and 50% yellow sarson RDF schedule had the maximum net returns among chemical treatments.

A claim from Influence of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of maize (Zea mays)yellow sarson (Brassica rapa) cropping system under rainfed mid hill condition · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% maize and 50% yellow sarson RDF schedule had the maximum net returns among chemical treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100 % RDF (maize) + 50% RDF (yellow sarson)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
19.4 103/hae0
Comparator
chemical treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum net returns ( 19.4 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.1) amongst the chemical treatment, was ob- served with 100 % RDF (maize) + 50% RDF (yellow sarson).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2281
t0

“maize (Zea mays)yellow sarson (Brassica rapa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–139

Title

Influence of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of maize (Zea mays)yellow sarson (Brassica rapa) cropping system under rainfed mid hill condition

DHIMAN MUKHERJEE Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i1.4540

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-433eaabde7ea21fe10789925b1409524a75b306006596e163ee93e01b7ea9584 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.