Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 60 kg P2O5/ha, broad bean had the highest nodulation, significantly above other phosphorus levels.

A claim from Response of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) to row spacing and phosphorus under late sown rainfed condition of Manipur. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg P2O5/ha, broad bean had the highest nodulation, significantly above other phosphorus levels.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the other levels of phosphoruse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broad bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38
e0

“the highest nodulation, seed yield and crude protein content was associated with the application of 60 kg P2O5/ha which was significantly superior to all the other levels of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–440

Title

Response of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) to row spacing and phosphorus under late sown rainfed condition of Manipur.

Edwin Luikham; M. Phulchand; P.S. Mariam Anal Agricultural science digest 2009

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-43c3871198ec79689fd124aa75532034c0b96b690b32e94742f9fd66d3bd259d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.