Claim · model-written summary
The most profitable combination yielded up to $4,854 USD ha −1 at Teopoxco versus $175 USD ha −1 for controls.
- Treatment
- agroforestry and conservation agriculturee0
- Outcome
- producee0
- Value
- $4,854 USD ha −1e0
- Qualifier
- $175 USD ha −1e0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
- Setting
- Teopoxcoe0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most profitable combinations of agroforestry and conservation agriculture could produce up to $4,854 USD ha −1 in Teopoxco and $2,143 USD ha −1 in Tamazulapam, while the control treatments in the same sites and years produced $175 USD ha −1 and $92 USD ha −1 respectively”
t0“Maize ( Zea mays L.)”
Title
Simon Fonteyne; Columba Silva Avendaño; Angel Ramos Sanchez; et al. Frontiers in Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3389/fagro.2021.787507
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Crop diversification raised system yield by up to 1.4 t ha −1 in Teopoxco.
- Intervention effect Crop diversification raised system yield by up to 1.7 t ha −1 in Tamazulapam.
- Intervention effect More fertilizer or liming did not improve profitability enough to justify use.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage and residue retention raised yield and lowered production costs.
- Observation Conservation agriculture with agroforestry was high yielding and profitable, with lower farmer risk.
- Intervention effect The most profitable combination yielded up to $2,143 USD ha −1 at Tamazulapam versus $92 USD ha −1 for controls.
- Observation Trees produced in several years when the main crop failed.