Claim · model-written summary
DSR reduced cultivation cost by 24% relative to PT rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- dry direct seedingt0
- Outcome
- cost of cultivatione0
- Direction
- re ductione0
- Value
- 24%e0
- Comparator
- PT ricee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“24% re duction in cost of cultivation than PT rice”
t0“viz. dry direct seeding (DSR)”
Title
SUKANTA K. SARANGI; B. MAJI; U.K. MANDAL; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i4.5543
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Submergence affected transplanted rice but not direct-seeded rice.
- Intervention effect Mean rice grain yields of PT, UNPT and DSR were statistically at par.
- Intervention effect DSR had the highest rice net returns at 36,000/ha.
- Intervention effect DSR had the highest rice benefit: cost ratio at 2.2.
- Intervention effect Following DSR reduced maize irrigation water requirement by 7.4 ha-cm.
- Intervention effect Following DSR increased maize irrigation water productivity by 27%.
- Intervention effect Raised bed sowing gave the highest maize yield at 5,600 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect Raised bed sowing gave the highest maize net returns at 37,910/ha.
- Observation Raised bed sowing gave maize a benefit: cost ratio of 1.86.
- Observation Direct-seeded rice followed by raised-bed maize had system rice-equivalent yield of 11,659 kg/ha.
- Observation The DSR–RBS system had net returns of 77,470/ha.
- Observation The DSR–RBS system had BCR of 2.05.
- Observation Rabi maize irrigation water productivity reached 79 kg/ ha-cm in the DSR–RBS system.
- Observation Rabi maize energy productivity reached 461 kg/GJ in the DSR–RBS system.