Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rose-end inoculation caused the greatest yield decrease and heel-end inoculation the least, relative to uninoculated plants.

A claim from The effect of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (blackleg) on potato plants. I. Growth and yield of different cultivars · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose-end inoculation caused the greatest yield decrease and heel-end inoculation the least, relative to uninoculated plants.

Taxon
potato plantsSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
rose‐end inoculatione0
Interactor
Erwinia carotovora subsp. atrosepticaPectobacterium atrosepticumt1pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium atrosepticum
Pectobacterium atrosepticum · InteractorAmy Charkowski · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Invariably rose‐end inoculation had the greatest and heel‐end the least effect in decreasing yield when compared with uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–422
t0

“The effect of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (blackleg) on potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79
t1

“Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–51

Title

The effect of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (blackleg) on potato plants. I. Growth and yield of different cultivars

D. H. LAPWOOD; PHILIPPA R. LEGG Annals of Applied Biology 1983. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1983.tb02742.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-4691eeacef8a2cbece9c2bc710a9e059c3bf23c85d8ccfbac35b00c78ce54fe8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Pectobacterium atrosepticum · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.