Claim · model-written summary
genetic variance for grain yield ranked F2-Syn8 > F2 > BCP1 > BCP2 without significant differences.
- Outcome
- genetic variancee0
- Direction
- rankede0
- Qualifier
- differences among generations were not significante0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The genetic variance and heritability for grain yield ranked F 2 ‐Syn 8 > F 2 > BCP 1 > BCP 2 , but differences among generations were not significant”
t0“Maize”
Title
Epistasis in an Elite Maize Hybrid and Choice of Generation for Inbred Line Development
Kendall R. Lamkey; Bruce J. Schnicker; Albrecht E. Melchinger Crop Science 1995. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183x003500050004x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Epistasis significantly affected grain yield and accounted for 21 of generation-mean variation.
- Association Epistasis significantly affected grain moisture and accounted for 18% of generation-mean variation.
- Observation heritability for grain yield ranked F2-Syn8 > F2 > BCP1 > BCP2 without significant differences.
- Observation Predicted gains ranked in agreement with heritability.
- Observation At low selection intensity, predicted mean (usefulness) followed the reported generation ranking.
- Observation At high selection intensity, usefulness followed the reported generation ranking.
- Recommendation Selection intensity primarily determines the choice between F2 and backcross source populations.
- Recommendation Random mating F2 before selection and inbreeding offers little to no advantage.