Observationmodel-written summary

TURBO and SH7200 were more unstable winter wheat cultivars based on OP and RMSD.

A claim from Performance and Stability of Winter Wheat Cultivars to Stagonospora nodorum Blotch Epidemics in Multi-Environment Trials · 2025

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TURBO and SH7200 were more unstable winter wheat cultivars based on OP and RMSD.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘TURBO’ and ‘SH7200’e0
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorumt0pathogen
Outcome
OP and RMSDe0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance and Stability of Winter Wheat Cultivars to Stagonospora nodorum Blotch Epidemics in Multi-Environment Trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120
e0

“Based on OP and RMSD, ‘USG 3230’ was the top-performing and most stable cultivar, whereas ‘TURBO’ and ‘SH7200’ were more unstable cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1800

Title

Performance and Stability of Winter Wheat Cultivars to Stagonospora nodorum Blotch Epidemics in Multi-Environment Trials

Vinicius C. Garnica; Mohammad Nasir Shalizi; Peter S. Ojiambo Phytopathology 2025. doi:10.1094/phyto-12-24-0398-r

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-490fe0732db8d8fa279c42a5647adfac65b10ad164df3cb540f5af009ef3f38b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer