Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Marketable potato yield in subsequent crops was statistically significant at site G after ALS treatment.

A claim from Reduction of potato scab and verticillium wilt with ammonium lignosulfonate soil amendment in four Ontario potato fields · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable potato yield in subsequent crops was statistically significant at site G after ALS treatment.

Treatment
ammonium lignosulfonatet0
Outcome
marketable yielde7
Qualifier
statistically significante6
Setting
site Ge6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Although marketable yield was consistently higher in subsequent crops at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1244
e6

“it was only statistically significant at site G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1293
t0

“Reduction of potato scab and verticillium wilt with ammonium lignosulfonate soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90

Title

Reduction of potato scab and verticillium wilt with ammonium lignosulfonate soil amendment in four Ontario potato fields

N. Soltani; K.L. Conn; P.A. Abbasi; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2002. doi:10.1080/07060660209507018

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-49b366fa46d6e144eaca5d2e552595daad89319102257da9f1c34b3c7daaf078 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.