Claim · model-written summary
Paddy yield in the one-hectare plot was classified into five different yield zones.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“assess yield variability of paddy crop using automatic yield monitoring (AYM) system”
e4“Yield variations were recorded in one ha plot, and classified in five different yield zones”
Title
Yield Variability Assessment in Paddy Crop using Automatic Yield Monitoring System
N. S. Chandel; K. N. Agrawal Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 2019. doi:10.52151/jae2018551.1687
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Method / resource The calibration factor of the AYM system for paddy crop was 6.79.
- Method / resource Yield measured by the automatic yield monitor differed from actual yield by +2.8 to +5.1%.
- Observation Maximum temporal yield variability in paddy was 14.7%, observed between 2014 and 2017.
- Observation The AYM system showed real-time temporal and spatial yield variability classification and quantification in paddy field.