Claim · model-written summary
The predicted critical weed-control period for grafted tomato was 2.2 to 4.5 WAT.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- grafted tomatoe0
- Interactor
- weedt0weed
- Outcome
- CPWCe0
- Value
- 2.2 to 4.5 WATe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The predicted CPWC was from 2.2 to 4.5 WAT in grafted tomato”
t0“Weed”
Title
Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Fresh Market Tomato
Sushila Chaudhari; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks; et al. Weed Science 2016. doi:10.1614/ws-d-15-00049.1
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Later weed establishment increased tomato aboveground biomass.
- Association Later weed removal decreased tomato biomass.
- Intervention effect At a given weed timing, grafted tomato produced higher biomass than nongrafted tomato.
- Association Delaying weed establishment decreased weed biomass.
- Association Delaying weed removal increased weed biomass by the same magnitude.
- Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for nongrafted tomato was 3.3 to 5.8 WAT.
- Intervention effect Grafting did not affect critical-period length of 2.3 or 2.5 weeks.
- Observation Critical-period management began and ended one week earlier for grafted tomato.