Claim · model-written summary
Tillage and straw return jointly explained more than 50% of yield changes.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage and straw return practices together explain more than 50% yield changes under climate change scenarios.”
t0“Maize”
Title
Hongrun Liu; Baocai Su; Rui Liu; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy15010001
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect No-tillage showed the greatest crop yield increase, 6.2%.
- Observation SOC was highest under no-tillage in the 0–20 cm layer across straw and climate scenarios.
- Intervention effect Removing straw decreased SOC in both scenarios.
- Intervention effect Returning straw increased SOC in both scenarios.
- Intervention effect SOCD declined, with the decline mitigated by straw return.
- Association Tillage and straw return significantly affected SOC under RCP4.5.
- Association Tillage and straw return did not significantly affect SOC under RCP8.5.