Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High seeding rates had no consistent effect on tertiary grains per spikelet.

A claim from Groat Yield and Plant Stand Structure of Naked and Hulled Oat under Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Seeding Rates · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High seeding rates had no consistent effect on tertiary grains per spikelet.

Treatment
high seeding ratese1
Outcome
number of tertiary grains per spikelete0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without having consistent effects on number of tertiary grains per spikelet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1537
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–5
e1

“Use of high seeding rates reduced both number of spikelets and grains per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1461

Title

Groat Yield and Plant Stand Structure of Naked and Hulled Oat under Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Seeding Rates

Pirjo Peltonen‐Sainio Agronomy Journal 1997. doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900010021x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-4d0ea3ca2edae35624d19ca5352f830d32cb0839ed2d786a5e0f0dc597473ca8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 29 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.