Claim · model-written summary
Growing conditions did not affect the response of rose cultivars to ethylene.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“single-stemmed plants of Rosa L.”
e3“Response to ethylene of all cultivars was not affected by the difference in growing conditions”
Title
Jose Antonio S. Grossi; H. Brent Pemberton; William E. Roberson HortScience 2000. doi:10.21273/hortsci.35.3.404e
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect A 0.1 μL·L -1 ethylene treatment reduced rose flower longevity by 1 day relative to the control.
- Intervention effect Ethylene at 1.0 and 5.0 μL·L -1 reduced rose flower longevity by 3 days relative to the control.
- Observation Rose cultivars RUIjef and MEIferjac had the longest flower longevity regardless of ethylene concentration or growing conditions.
- Observation Rose cultivars MEIghivon and MEIgagul had the shortest flower longevity regardless of ethylene concentration or growing conditions.
- Intervention effect Except RUIrosora, rose cultivars had longer flower longevity under summer-like conditions than under winter-like conditions, by 1.5 to 5 days.
- Association Flower longevity of RUIrosora was similar regardless of growing conditions.
- Mechanism Seasonal differences in flower longevity are not explained by ethylene response, so other factors are likely involved.