Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Production-year yields were similar for manure and fertilizer on soils testing very high in P and K.

A claim from Preplant Manure and Commercial P and K Fertilizer Effects on Alfalfa Production · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production-year yields were similar for manure and fertilizer on soils testing very high in P and K.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
manuree2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
similare2
Comparator
fertilizere2
Setting
very highe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Many dairy producers are being forced to consider applying manure onto their alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) acres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112
e2

“With “very high” soil P and K tests, production‐year yields were similar for the manure and fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–861

Title

Preplant Manure and Commercial P and K Fertilizer Effects on Alfalfa Production

M. A. Schmitt; C. C. Shaeffer; G. W. Randall jpa 1993. doi:10.2134/jpa1993.0385

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4eab9a5753dfe55e99592278a6ce17d7ae651349d3eed080921642fbc43ee0b3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 151 positive, 33 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 150 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Manure increased alfalfa yield.

    Nitrate‐nitrogen Removal from Soil Profiles by Alfalfa · 1975 · compared with 0

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

175 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.