Claim · model-written summary
Araiostegia, Humata, and Scyphularia clades separated the Davallia clades.
DavalliaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the clades are separated by the intervention of a clade of Araiostegia, Humata and Scyphularia”
t0“DAVALLIACEAE”
Title
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC STUDY ON DAVALLIACEAE
Chie Tsutsumi; Masahiro Kato 2005
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation The five-region chloroplast phylogeny conflicted with previous Davalliaceae classifications.
- Observation None of the sampled Davalliaceae genera were monophyletic.
- Observation Araiostegia split into two clades, including a basal clade with Davallodes and another nested in the family.
- Observation Davallia split into three clades matching three scale morphology sections.
- Observation Humata was paraphyletic.
- Observation Scyphularia was paraphyletic.