Claim · model-written summary
BR and GA3 showed no synergism in sheath elongation.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- BR and GA3e0
- Outcome
- leaf sheath elongatione0
- Direction
- nor did any synergism existe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nor did any synergism exist between BR and GA3 in leaf lamina bending or leaf sheath elongation”
t0“Rice”
Title
Kiyotoshi Takeno; Richard P. Pharis Plant and Cell Physiology 1982. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076471
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect BR significantly induced leaf lamina bending at 100 ng/plant and higher.
- Intervention effect BR modestly enhanced leaf sheath elongation at 10,000 ng/plant.
- Intervention effect GA3 had no significant effect on lamina bending.
- Intervention effect BR and GA3 showed no synergism in lamina bending.
- Intervention effect Ethylene did not cause lamina bending.
- Intervention effect Ethephon did not cause lamina bending.
- Intervention effect Ethylene did not synergize the BR effect.
- Intervention effect Ethephon did not synergize the BR effect.
- Intervention effect IAA caused significant lamina bending at 5,000 ng/plant.
- Intervention effect α-naphthaleneacetic acid caused significant lamina bending at 5,000 ng/plant.
- Intervention effect IAA significantly synergized BR bending at 500 ng/ plant.
- Intervention effect α-naphthaleneacetic acid significantly synergized BR bending.
- Intervention effect TIBA nullified BR bending and BR–IAA synergized bending.
- Intervention effect PCIB nullified BR bending and BR–IAA synergized bending.
- Mechanism The authors infer endogenous auxin may mediate BR bending.