Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yields did not differ between irrigation methods.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- irrigation methodse5
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- did not differe5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e5“yields did not differ between irrigation methods”
Title
Estimating Stem Water Flow in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Under Different Irrigation Methods
D. L. Rowland; R. B. Sorensen; K. S. Balkcom; et al. Peanut Science 2005. doi:10.3146/0095-3679(2005)32[81:eswfip]2.0.co;2
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource Peanut stem water flow was successfully measured with sap flow collars during a two week period coinciding with active pod fill.
- Observation Mean daily sap flow rate of peanut in irrigated treatments ranged from 4-6 g/hr.
- Observation Mean daily sap flow rate of peanut in the dryland treatment ranged from 1-2 g/hr.
- Intervention effect Irrigation treatments differed significantly in peanut daily water use patterns, average daily water use and cumulative daily water use based on sap flow.
- Association Soil moisture, soil temperature and canopy surface temperature were significantly correlated with peanut plant sap flow.
- Intervention effect Subsurface drip irrigated peanut plants had more leaf mass, longer internodes and larger canopies than overhead irrigated or non-irrigated plants.
- Intervention effect Seasonal water-use efficiency measured by carbon isotope discrimination did not definitively show lower efficiency for subsurface drip plants.