Claim · model-written summary
Cutting treatment and variety did not significantly influence forage production at GS25.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- cutting treatmente0
- Outcome
- Forage production at GS25e0
- Direction
- not significantly influencede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“Forage production at GS25 and total biomass yield at GS31 were not significantly influenced by cutting treatment or variety”
Title
Wheat morphological defoliation regimes and regrowth potential
Tahseen Zeb; Matthew Tom Harrison; TB Acuna; et al. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) 2017
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Clipping increased Tennant height at GS31 by 25% at LL50% compared with Crash and control treatments.
- Intervention effect Clipping increased Tennant height at GS31 by 17% at LL75% compared with Crash and control treatments.
- Intervention effect Clipping increased Revenue height at GS31 by 1.8% at LL50% compared with Crash and control treatments.
- Intervention effect Clipping increased Revenue height at GS31 by 4.4% at LL75% compared with Crash and control treatments.
- Intervention effect Clipping increased crop height by 15% relative to control treatments.
- Intervention effect Clipping had positive effects on wheat regrowth.
- Association Cutting treatment and variety did not significantly influence total biomass yield at GS31.
- Intervention effect Crash treatments produced greater forage yield than Clipping.
- Intervention effect Crash treatments generally reduced final recovery and biomass relative to Clipping.
- Recommendation The authors inferred that wheat clipped above the leaf sheath at mid tillering may yield more forage than uncut plants and recover height rapidly.