Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 80% SWC, cress rotation had higher soil microbial diversity than at 100% SWC and control.

A claim from Crop Rotation With Cress Increases Cucumber Yields by Regulating the Composition of the Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Community · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% SWC, cress rotation had higher soil microbial diversity than at 100% SWC and control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Cress rotation under 80% SWCe0
Outcome
soil microbial diversitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cress rotation under 100% SWC and controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cress rotation under 80% SWC had higher soil microbial diversity than cress rotation under 100% SWC and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–883
e1

“single cress rotation resulted in a higher cucumber yield than double cress rotation and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–770

Title

Crop Rotation With Cress Increases Cucumber Yields by Regulating the Composition of the Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Community

Xiaoya Gong; Jibo Shi; Xingang Zhou; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.631882

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-536994abd64fc95a91e83beb902db37376006633b879549acf8fde8b6302105e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

rotation · soil: biology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.