Claim · model-written summary
At 0.08% contamination, lint yield fell by 3% to 20%.
Gossypium hirsutumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“contamination rates of 0.08%, 0.8%, and 8% decreased yield by 3% to 20%, 45% to 58%, and 80% to 96%, respectively.”
t0“cotton”
Title
Non–2,4-D–resistant cotton response to glyphosate plus 2,4-D choline tank contamination
Misha R. Manuchehri; Peter A. Dotray; J. Wayne Keeling; et al. Weed Technology 2019. doi:10.1017/wet.2019.85
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Visual injury was greater after nine-leaf than first-bloom application in all three years.
- Intervention effect Yield loss was greater after nine-leaf than first-bloom application in two of three years.
- Intervention effect The 0.0008% contamination rate did not change lint yield relative to the untreated control.
- Intervention effect The 0.008% contamination rate did not change lint yield relative to the untreated control.
- Intervention effect At 0.8% contamination, lint yield fell by 45% to 58%.
- Intervention effect At 8% contamination, lint yield fell by 80% to 96%.
- Intervention effect Contamination at 0.0008%, 0.008%, 0.08%, and 0.8% rarely affected fiber quality.
- Intervention effect At 8% contamination, micronaire, length, uniformity and strength frequently decreased.
- Association Reduced fiber quality reduced cotton loan value and potential financial return.
- Intervention effect The 0.8% contamination rate significantly reduced financial return through yield loss.