Claim · model-written summary
In the herb layer, 83 pairs had nonsignificant association.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“other 83 pairs' was nonsignificant”
t0“understory species”
Title
[Interspecific association between understory species in a southern highland plantation].
Lile Hu; Boqian Yan; Qijing Liu; et al. PubMed 2005
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Few species pairs in either shrub or herb layer reached significant chi-square association.
- Observation In the shrub layer, 12 pairs had highly significant association.
- Observation In the shrub layer, 19 pairs had significant association.
- Observation In the shrub layer, 200 pairs had nonsignificant association.
- Observation In the herb layer, 11 pairs had highly significant association.
- Observation In the herb layer, 11 pairs had significant association.
- Observation Shrub species were divided into two groups by association and correlation.
- Association Many species in shrub group I were negatively associated with species in group II.
- Observation Dominant shrub species played a key role in interspecific relationships.
- Association The three dominant herb species had highly significant positive correlations with each other.
- Association The dominant herb species had significant or highly significant positive associations with many other herbaceous species.
- Observation The shrub layer had a positive to negative association ratio of 125/106.
- Observation The herb layer had a positive to negative association ratio of 42/63.