Claim · model-written summary
At low light intensity the perenne group had a greater NAR, which compensated for its lower LAR.
LoliumNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Lolium Populations”
e1“At the low intensity this was compensated by a greater NAR in the perenne group, with no resultant difference in RGR”
Title
D. WILSON; J. P. COOPER Annals of Botany 1969. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084339
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation RGR, NAR and LAR differed significantly between Lolium populations at both light intensities.
- Association The multiflorum group had a greater leaf-area ratio than the perenne group at both light intensities.
- Association The multiflorum group had a lower specific leaf weight than the perenne group at both light intensities.
- Association The multiflorum group had lower chlorophyll content than the perenne group at both light intensities.
- Association At low light intensity there was no resultant difference in RGR between the perenne and multiflorum groups.
- Association At high light intensity there was no difference in NAR between the groups.
- Association At high light intensity the multiflorum group had a greater RGR than the perenne group.
- Mechanism Variation between Lolium populations in RGR was based on differences in NAR rather than in LAR at both light intensities.
- Association There was no regular correlation of NAR with specific leaf weight or chlorophyll content at either light intensity.
- Association At low light intensity NAR was significantly correlated with shoot-root ratio.