Claim · model-written summary
Nozzle type did not change herbicide efficacy in field trials, and nozzle selection had no significant main or interaction effect.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- nozzle typee3
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- herbicide efficacye3
- Direction
- did not translate to differencese3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“used to control Palmer amaranth in peanut”
e2“Nozzle selection was not significant in field trials as a main effect or as an interaction at any location”
e3“Despite reduced coverage by AI nozzles, nozzle type did not translate to differences in herbicide efficacy in the field”
Title
Influence of Carrier Volume and Nozzle Selection on Palmer Amaranth Control
S. T. Berger; M. H. Dobrow; J. A. Ferrell; et al. Peanut Science 2014. doi:10.3146/ps13-20.1
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect XR nozzles provided more spray coverage than AI nozzles.
- Association The carrier volume by application timing interaction was significant at each location for Palmer amaranth control.
- Intervention effect Applications at 5 to 10 cm tall Palmer amaranth with 94, 187 or 281 L/ha provided over 90% control in 2008 at Williston, FL.
- Intervention effect Applications to 15 to 20 cm tall weeds provided less control.
- Intervention effect Applications to smaller weeds provided sufficient control at any carrier volume tested.
- Intervention effect Carrier volume did not affect control of small weeds.
- Intervention effect On larger Palmer amaranth, control was reduced at smaller spray volumes.
- Recommendation Growers should apply lactofen to smaller Palmer amaranth plants for the most effective control in peanut.