Claim · model-written summary
Sepal initiation differs in timing and position between T. lanceolata and T. xerophila.
- Taxon
- Tasmannia lanceolata
Tasmannia lanceolatae0 - Organ / stage
- sepale0
- Outcome
- timing and position of sepal initiatione0
- Direction
- differse0
- Comparator
- T. xerophilae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“floral development in Tasmannia lanceolata and T. xerophila indicates that timing and position of sepal initiation differs between them”
Title
Floral development and molecular phylogeny support the generic status of Tasmannia (Winteraceae)
Andrew N. Doust; Andrew N. Drinnan American Journal of Botany 2004. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.3.321
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation Tasmannia and Drimys do not form a monophyletic group.
- Observation Likelihood-ratio tests and parametric bootstrapping support separating Tasmannia and Drimys.
- Association Subsequent organ initiation in Tasmannia follows sepal position.
- Mechanism In Drimys winteri, a long interval between sepal and petal initiation produces many phyllotactic patterns.
- Observation Calyptra formation in Tasmannia and Drimys probably evolved independently in parallel.