Claim · model-written summary
fAPAR models fitted better than fCover models.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Models fitted to sensor-derived fAPAR (fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation) demonstrated a higher goodness of fit as compared to fCover (fraction of vegetation cover)”
Title
Crop Phenology Modelling Using Proximal and Satellite Sensor Data
Anne Gobin; Abdoul-Hamid Mohamed Sallah; Yannick Curnel; et al. Remote Sensing 2023. doi:10.3390/rs15082090
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Spectral signals were crop specific and sensor independent.
- Method / resource Model fits were best for maize, then wheat and potato.
- Observation S2 fAPAR variability decreased through the growing season.
- Method / resource Double sigmoid inflection points corresponded to stem elongation and senescence.
- Method / resource The upward endpoint corresponded to canopy closure, and maxima to flowering and fruit development.
- Recommendation More frequent revisits were beneficial for detecting short crop stages.