Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct-sown plots had superior tiller numbers compared with transplanted plots.

A claim from ON THE EFFECT OF THE OPENING TIME OF IRRIGATION ON THE GROWTH OF RICE PLANT. Report 2 (2) · 1952

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct-sown plots had superior tiller numbers compared with transplanted plots.

Treatment
direct sowing plotse2
Outcome
tillere2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
transplanting plotse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–779
e2

“And as to tiller the direct sowing plots are recorded to be superior to the transplanting plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2397–2493

Title

ON THE EFFECT OF THE OPENING TIME OF IRRIGATION ON THE GROWTH OF RICE PLANT. Report 2 (2)

S. MIURA; Y. KANEKI Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1952. doi:10.1626/jcs.20.303

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-5cdea29fb2bd2e6cb999de73760c6285ca44b5fd1e55ec39850a13034626afd1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,069 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.