Claim · model-written summary
Laboratory meter reflectance repeatability was acceptable 81% of the time.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Outcome
- similar measurementse0
- Value
- 81%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Acceptable values for similar measurements with two laboratory meters were 75%, 81%, and 75%.”
e1“Samples were collected from the cotton during gin processing throughout the ginning seasons”
Title
Field Evaluation of Color/Trash Meters
W. S. Anthony Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1992. doi:10.13031/2013.26068
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Method / resource Gin meters operated without maintenance problems through the seasons.
- Method / resource Trash repeatability was acceptable 72% of the time for gin meters.
- Method / resource Reflectance repeatability was acceptable 49% of the time for gin meters.
- Method / resource Yellowness repeatability was acceptable 79% of the time for gin meters.
- Method / resource Laboratory meter trash repeatability was acceptable 75% of the time.
- Method / resource Gin reflectance repeatability was lower than laboratory repeatability.
- Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin trash repeatability rose to 84%.
- Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin reflectance repeatability rose to 73%.
- Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin yellowness repeatability rose to 87%.
- Method / resource Color grades were estimated correctly about 55% of the time.
- Method / resource Color grades were estimated within one grade 94% of the time.
- Recommendation Video meters were judged usable for color and trash estimation in commercial ginning.