Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NPKS + FYM gave a yield superiority of 143% over the control.

A claim from Assessing the impact of nutrient omissions on growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency in winter rape ( Brassica napus L.) under rainfed ecology · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPKS + FYM gave a yield superiority of 143% over the control.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
NPKS + FYMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
143%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed yield of 1250 kg ha−1 was registered with NPKS + FYM, with a yield superiority of 143% over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–767
t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103

Title

Assessing the impact of nutrient omissions on growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency in winter rape ( Brassica napus L.) under rainfed ecology

Intikhab Aulam Jehangir; Bisma Jan; Abdel Rahman M. Al-Tawaha; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2330527

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-5e4e43e52cda6360595c0282162d939452452abd776786ce535e0f9bfba4555a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this claim · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.