Intervention effectmodel-written summary

sunflower seed yield increased by 18 under Sunhemp green manuring versus 75% recommended farmyard manure.

A claim from Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in chewing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and their residual effect on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under different fertility levels · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sunflower seed yield increased by 18 under Sunhemp green manuring versus 75% recommended farmyard manure.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sunhemp green manuringe0
Outcome
sunflower seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18e0
Comparator
75% recommended farmyard manuree0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunhemp green manuring to chewing tobacco significantly increased the sunflower seed yield and oil yield by 18 and 25%, respectively, over the 75% recommended farmyard manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1447
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–149

Title

Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in chewing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and their residual effect on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under different fertility levels

M. Kumaresan; Akash Swamy; P. Harishu Kumar Indian Journal of Agronomy 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-5e6aff8feab6dc124b06eca03d1d83e5016c7237105c13de3b806cff5b17bbb9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

356 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.