Claim · model-written summary
Spray evaluation based on predominant lesions classified intermediate varieties as more resistant than evaluation based on the largest lesion.
- Taxon
- rice varieties
Oryza sativae1
- Outcome
- intermediate varieties were judged to be more resistante0
- Direction
- more resistante0
- Comparator
- evaluation based on the type of the largest lesione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In spraying method, intermediate varieties were judged to be more resistant by the evaluation based on the type of predominant lesions than by the evaluation based on the type of the largest lesion.”
e1“rice varieties”
Title
Comparison among Various Methods for Testing Blast Resistance of Rice Varieties
Shigehisa KIYOSAWA Japanese Journal of Phytopathology 1970. doi:10.3186/jjphytopath.36.325
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource All pairs of blast-resistance methods showed curvilinear regressions.
- Method / resource The methods differed in estimated resistance level and had upper and lower measurement limits.
- Method / resource Injection classified intermediate varieties as more susceptible than spraying.
- Method / resource Four-week inoculation gave a more resistant reaction than two-week inoculation.
- Method / resource Inoculation with Ken 54-04 gave a more resistant reaction than Ken 54-20.
- Method / resource Less aggressive fungal strains could reveal part of field resistance missed by the usual greenhouse test.
- Method / resource Increasing plant age or using field-like growing conditions could reveal field resistance missed by the usual greenhouse test.