Claim · model-written summary
Weed management significantly affected maize growth, yield and yield attributes.
- Treatment
- different weed management practicese0
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield attributing parameterse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The growth, yield and yield attributing parameters of maize were significantly affected by the different weed management practices.”
Title
Ravindar Saini; Anjan Krishna Sarmah; Rinjumoni Dutta; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123658
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Nutrient management practices significantly affected maize growth and yield traits.
- Intervention effect N3 produced maximum maize growth parameters.
- Intervention effect N3 produced 23.76 q/ha grain yield.
- Intervention effect N3 produced 74.55 q/ha stover yield.
- Intervention effect WM4 gave the highest maize yield.
- Intervention effect WM4 produced 21.77 q/ha grain yield.
- Intervention effect WM4 produced 71.12 q/ha stover yield.
- Intervention effect Nutrient and weed management interaction effects were not significant.
- Intervention effect N3WM4 yielded the highest gross return of ₹.1, 03816.00/ha.
- Intervention effect N3WM4 yielded the highest net return of ₹.67, 956.00.
- Intervention effect N3WM4 yielded the highest benefit cost ratio of 1.90.