Claim · model-written summary
5.3% of ratings fell outside the 95% agreement limits.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Outcome
- ratings were outside of the 95% limits of agreemente0
- Value
- 5.3%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5.3% of ratings were outside of the 95% limits of agreement”
t0“lettuce”
Title
Accuracy, reliability, and timing of visual evaluations of decay in fresh-cut lettuce
Ivan Simko; Ryan J. Hayes PLoS ONE 2018. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194635
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Method / resource Experienced raters had 0.97 repeatability.
- Method / resource Experienced raters had 0.92 reproducibility.
- Method / resource Experienced raters had 0.96 accuracy.
- Method / resource Inexperienced raters had 0.93 repeatability.
- Method / resource Inexperienced raters had 0.80 reproducibility.
- Method / resource Inexperienced raters had 0.90 accuracy.
- Observation Aberrant ratings clustered at intermediate decay.
- Method / resource Aberrant ratings ranged from 0.6% to 4.4% for experienced raters.
- Method / resource Aberrant ratings ranged from 6.1% to 15.6% for inexperienced raters.
- Recommendation The authors recommend training new raters with intermediate-decay examples, diagrams and experienced-rater consultation.
- Method / resource Experienced-rater agreement supports use of visual decay ratings.
- Recommendation The authors recommend multiple evaluation times until 42 days after processing and an AUDePS summary.
- Method / resource The recommended approach lets experienced evaluators distinguish lettuce accessions and identify cultivars with reduced decay.