Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azotobacter + PSB produced the highest grain yield of 2267 kg/ha compared with 1653 kg/ha without biofertilizers.

A claim from Effect of nitrogen levels and biofertilizers on growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under north western Rajasthan · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter + PSB produced the highest grain yield of 2267 kg/ha compared with 1653 kg/ha without biofertilizers.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Azotobacter + PSBe0
Interactor
Azotobacter + PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2267 kg/hae0
Qualifier
1653 kg/hae0
Comparator
no biofertilizers treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–104
e0

“Significantly highest grain (2267 kg/ha) and stover (3636 kg/ha) yield were obtained with Azotobacter + PSB, whereas, lowest grain (1653 kg/ha) and stover (3050 kg/ha) yield under no biofertilizers treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–644

Title

Effect of nitrogen levels and biofertilizers on growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under north western Rajasthan

Rinku; P. S. Shekhawat; Narendra Kumawat; et al. Annals of Agricultural Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-64ec6fd44ed40bacf8b4de744da0210a8f12ab42ec3a376944459c15f7977d4c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.