Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Earthing up by pant fertilizer band placement cum earthing machine increased maize grain yield by 9.25% compared with earthing by earther.

A claim from Effect of different tillage and earthing up practices on growth and productivity of maize crop (Zea mays L.) in Tarai region of Uttarakhand · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthing up by pant fertilizer band placement cum earthing machine increased maize grain yield by 9.25% compared with earthing by earther.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
earthing by pant fertilizer band placement cum earthing machinee6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
9.25%e6
Comparator
earthing by earthere6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of different tillage and earthing up practices on growth and productivity of maize crop (Zea mays L.) in Tarai region of Uttarakhand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139
e6

“The treatment earthing by pant fertilizer band placement cum earthing machine recorded 9.25% higher grain yield as compared to earthing by earther, 20.65% higher than manual earthing, 22% higher than earthing by cultivator and 36% higher than no earthing treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1772

Title

Effect of different tillage and earthing up practices on growth and productivity of maize crop (Zea mays L.) in Tarai region of Uttarakhand

Anil Nath; Naresh Malik; VK Singh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-6533f3895fd3908d9f77f51e6f23b31b0644ec13f80f7955728ab70309e77cc4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.