Restored site vegetation developed continuously toward donor site vegetation.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: sandy grasslandt0
Outcome: development of the restored sitese0
Direction: towardse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“NMDS revealed a continuous development of the restored sites towards the corresponding donor sites”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1144

t0
“sandy grassland”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–145

Title

Is the combination of topsoil replacement and inoculation with plant material an effective tool for the restoration of threatened sandy grassland?

Carsten Eichberg; Christian Storm; Michael Stroh; et al. Applied Vegetation Science 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109x.2010.01082.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Target species ratios in restored sites tended toward donor site ratios.
Intervention effect Grazing reduced a carpet forming moss and litter.
Intervention effect Grazing significantly enhanced relative target species cover in the final two years.
Method / resource The combined restoration approach was judged very effective.
Observation After four years, restored communities functioned as developed habitat network parts.

Record rev-67786f987bb9b640837bf26b2b81d747a1fcba8553e42ec6733d074d84d5aa8b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer