Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Harvesting twice gave little specific methane yield advantage.

A claim from Biomass and methane yield of giant reed (Arundo donaxL.) as affected by single and double annual harvest · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting twice gave little specific methane yield advantage.

Taxon
giant reedArundo donaxt0
Treatment
harvesting biomass twicee0
Outcome
specific methane yielde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arundo donax
Arundo donax · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In terms of specific methane yield there was little advantage in harvesting biomass twice during the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1333
t0

“giant reed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39

Title

Biomass and methane yield of giant reed (Arundo donaxL.) as affected by single and double annual harvest

Enrico Ceotto; Ciro Vasmara; Rosa Marchetti; et al. GCB Bioenergy 2020. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12790

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-67907e9e50c1f2d202e235680ac9ae47aaff429b61f6504d59e14d4c79b058e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer