Claim · model-written summary
Four listed crossing combinations were most promising for didymella resistance.
- Taxon
- raspberryt0
- Material
- Brigantina × Lavina, 8-6-3 × Cowichan, Skromnitsa × Fenomen, 18-11-2 × 11-126-1e0
- Outcome
- resistance to didymellae0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The most promising combinations of crossing for resistance to didymella were combinations of crossing Brigantina × Lavina, 8-6-3 × Cowichan, Skromnitsa × Fenomen, 18-11-2 × 11-126-1”
t0“Raspberry”
Title
Raspberry breeding for resistance to fungal diseases
Maksim Podgaeckiy; Sergey Evdokimenko Agrarian Bulletin of the 2022. doi:10.32417/1997-4868-2022-226-11-58-69
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Association Raspberry genotype susceptibility to fungal disease depended on climatic conditions.
- Observation Ivan Kupala, Patritsiya, Lavina, Brigantina, Sputnitsa and Newburg were sources of resistance to didymella.
- Observation Selections 11-126-1, 8-10x-1 and 18-11-2 were sources of didymella resistance.
- Observation Mariya, Glen Ample, Meteor and Zhuravlik were sources of anthracnose resistance.
- Observation Cowichan, Mariya, Zhuravlik and Selection 11-126-1 were sources of septoria spot resistance.
- Observation Disease defeat in the identified resistance sources did not exceed 1.0 point in peak disease years.
- Observation Five listed crossing combinations were most promising for anthracnose resistance.
- Observation Ulybka × Vol’nitsa and Gusar × Vol’nitsa were most promising for septoria spot resistance.
- Observation Five hybrid fund forms were valuable starting material for breeding resistance to major pathogens.