Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Early or full bloom topping, high topping or increased spacing decreased percent filler.

A claim from LES EFFETS DU STADE, DE LA HAUTEUR D’ECIMAGE ET DE LA DISTANCE DE PLANTATION SUR LA PRODUCTION DU TABAC A CIGARE · 1977

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early or full bloom topping, high topping or increased spacing decreased percent filler.

Treatment
topping at either early or full bloom, high topping or by increased planting distance in the rowe0
Outcome
percent fillere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco quality, gross return, percent marketable tobacco, percent filler, nicotine and total alkaloids were decreased by topping at either early or full bloom, high topping or by increased planting distance in the row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–611
t0

“TABAC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103
e1

“Tobacco quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–408

Title

LES EFFETS DU STADE, DE LA HAUTEUR D’ECIMAGE ET DE LA DISTANCE DE PLANTATION SUR LA PRODUCTION DU TABAC A CIGARE

M. LAMARRE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1977. doi:10.4141/cjps77-165

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6f5196bb4e2ae805e0127ab089043e81f52e1d1276908bb4ae2fdef1aebaec25 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.